|
|
Post by cdiplayer on Sept 5, 2012 5:01:56 GMT -6
Have the changes in the Middle East such as Libya becoming democratic, the Syrian opposition, etc. been added to this mod?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fistalis on Sept 5, 2012 19:27:25 GMT -6
Have the changes in the Middle East such as Libya becoming democratic, the Syrian opposition, etc. been added to this mod? Yes to Libya, No to syria. I have not added the syrian opposition as its own faction at this time due to many factors. As the situation over there evolves I continually look at doing revisions to include them. But until I think they have chance at standing IN GAME against the syrian forces adding them would be pointless as they would likely fall the same day. Part of the issue may be outdated information on what the units are in the syrian army, if you have a source with updated information on this it would go a long way. The syrian Forces in game may be far stronger than the current reality due to relying on sources that aren't up to date. |
|
|
|
Post by cdiplayer on Sept 15, 2012 6:37:12 GMT -6
Ah I see, maybe you could make a custom scenario of some sort that has the Syrian Opposition? Also, in games where world volatility is turned off, the Syrian Opposition getting eliminated wouldn't be a problem. The other thing I wanted to ask is does this mod have Kosovo and South Sudan? Oh and one last thing, are Uyghurstan and Tibet still in the game as Chinese colonies? One of my favorite things about Supreme Ruler Cold War is being able to liberate these two countries and make central Asia a bit more interesting. I know that realistically these two regions aren't really colonies but for game play sake I think they should be included.
|
|
|
|
Post by mertcanks on Sept 15, 2012 7:51:59 GMT -6
I think Arabs should be opened in a separate pact.Because they remain very passive.You should think Fistalis.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fistalis on Sept 15, 2012 9:46:13 GMT -6
Ah I see, maybe you could make a custom scenario of some sort that has the Syrian Opposition? Also, in games where world volatility is turned off, the Syrian Opposition getting eliminated wouldn't be a problem. The other thing I wanted to ask is does this mod have Kosovo and South Sudan? Oh and one last thing, are Uyghurstan and Tibet still in the game as Chinese colonies? One of my favorite things about Supreme Ruler Cold War is being able to liberate these two countries and make central Asia a bit more interesting. I know that realistically these two regions aren't really colonies but for game play sake I think they should be included. I doubt I will make a custom scenario. I generally have enough projects to keep up with. As to them not falling on low volatility, they still would because they would start AT war since currently they are.. South Sudan? Yes its in. Kosovo? yes its in. uyghurstan and Tibet? Under total chinese control. Hong Kong is a colony though due to it being a special administrative region. (it has some limited autonomy much like a colony in game) I think Arabs should be opened in a separate pact.Because they remain very passive.You should think Fistalis. When Arab Nations sign a Mutual protection pact like NATO then I'll put it in the modern world. Until then you should try My state of the unions mod webpages.charter.net/fistalis/State%20of%20The%20Unions.html |
|
|
|
Post by cdiplayer on Sept 15, 2012 18:14:04 GMT -6
Ah I see, maybe you could make a custom scenario of some sort that has the Syrian Opposition? Also, in games where world volatility is turned off, the Syrian Opposition getting eliminated wouldn't be a problem. The other thing I wanted to ask is does this mod have Kosovo and South Sudan? Oh and one last thing, are Uyghurstan and Tibet still in the game as Chinese colonies? One of my favorite things about Supreme Ruler Cold War is being able to liberate these two countries and make central Asia a bit more interesting. I know that realistically these two regions aren't really colonies but for game play sake I think they should be included. I doubt I will make a custom scenario. I generally have enough projects to keep up with. As to them not falling on low volatility, they still would because they would start AT war since currently they are.. South Sudan? Yes its in. Kosovo? yes its in. uyghurstan and Tibet? Under total chinese control. Hong Kong is a colony though due to it being a special administrative region. (it has some limited autonomy much like a colony in game) I think Arabs should be opened in a separate pact.Because they remain very passive.You should think Fistalis. When Arab Nations sign a Mutual protection pact like NATO then I'll put it in the modern world. Until then you should try My state of the unions mod webpages.charter.net/fistalis/State%20of%20The%20Unions.htmlTibet and Uyghurstan are considered autonomous regions though, I think you should consider making them colonies, or having some way for them to become independent if China gets destroyed or something. |
|
|
|
Post by mertcanks on Sept 16, 2012 4:00:58 GMT -6
I saw a new fistalis.Great!.mode is exactly I'm looking for  1)Will the update for this mod.Because its great looked. 2) Is modern mod will add ? So Can you combine? 3)I think to work in union mode |
|
|
|
Post by Fistalis on Sept 16, 2012 5:37:05 GMT -6
Tibet and Uyghurstan are considered autonomous regions though, I think you should consider making them colonies, or having some way for them to become independent if China gets destroyed or something. While they are defined as autonomous regions that really is nothing more than a label. Its similar to suggesting the states of the U.S. Should be made into colonies. As to them becoming independent if china falls, Unfortunately thats not possible. I would do it if it was. I saw a new fistalis.Great!.mode is exactly I'm looking for 1)Will the update for this mod.Because its great looked. 2) Is modern mod will add ? So Can you combine? 3)I think to work in union mode Its not new, it was made about 6 months ago and has been on the web site for atleast 5 months. Yes it will be updated, No the 2 wont be combined. |
|
|
|
Post by mertcanks on Sept 16, 2012 10:05:21 GMT -6
Okey.I understand.Update 3 release,union mod new update? Union mod really great.You should to be continued.... |
|
|
|
Post by cdiplayer on Sept 17, 2012 1:41:18 GMT -6
By the way I also thought you should know that the leader of Yemen in the game is inaccurate. Saleh is no longer the leader. I also think you went a bit over board on classifying countries as dictatorships. Somalia, Egypt and Iraq should be classified as democracies. Maybe Yemen as well, it depends on how optimistic you are in that regard.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fistalis on Sept 17, 2012 5:40:37 GMT -6
By the way I also thought you should know that the leader of Yemen in the game is inaccurate. Saleh is no longer the leader. I also think you went a bit over board on classifying countries as dictatorships. Somalia, Egypt and Iraq should be classified as democracies. Maybe Yemen as well, it depends on how optimistic you are in that regard. The last update was released March 3rd of this year. At the time Egypt was under control of its military. Hence the dictatorship with General Sharaf as the leader. Mohamed Morisi Is already added in my version. Somalia Was under control of the Transitional federal Government and hadn't had elections yet. As for Iraq, Al-maliki was hand selected by the U.S. in 2006 and Is the Prime minister, the minister of the Interior, Minister of defense and minister of national security.(6 years later) Sound like a democracy to you? (I put talibani in as leader though  ) Yemen the situation was still very fluid back at the time of the last update. So some of them are likely to see changes in both leaders and Government types in the next update. There is a ton of other things that have changed since march as well. Putin is again (officially) leading russia, france now has Hollande etc. Libya's leader is no longer correct etc etc etc. These will all be updated as well. (After Update 3 is released By BG) I appreciate you bringing them to my attention though as I might have forgotten to switch them. Also there is a thread where you can note that a leader has changed since the last update so i have a ready list available for when I go to make the changes. You can find it here fistalis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=gdmw&action=display&thread=29If you come across any other nations that you question the government type of feel free to post them. Preferably to their own thread. As much as I would like to its hard for me to research everything thoroughly. Sometimes I need a bit of a tip that I should look further into something. Just so happens that the ones you mentioned I was aware of because of fluid situation in that part of the world. (currently I'm looking at all the Attacks on U.S. embassies and dreading how much I have to adjust civilian diplomatic ratings. But thats a discussion for another thread) |
|
|
|
Post by cdiplayer on Sept 18, 2012 3:59:39 GMT -6
By the way I also thought you should know that the leader of Yemen in the game is inaccurate. Saleh is no longer the leader. I also think you went a bit over board on classifying countries as dictatorships. Somalia, Egypt and Iraq should be classified as democracies. Maybe Yemen as well, it depends on how optimistic you are in that regard. The last update was released March 3rd of this year. At the time Egypt was under control of its military. Hence the dictatorship with General Sharaf as the leader. Mohamed Morisi Is already added in my version. Somalia Was under control of the Transitional federal Government and hadn't had elections yet. As for Iraq, Al-maliki was hand selected by the U.S. in 2006 and Is the Prime minister, the minister of the Interior, Minister of defense and minister of national security.(6 years later) Sound like a democracy to you? (I put talibani in as leader though ) Yemen the situation was still very fluid back at the time of the last update. So some of them are likely to see changes in both leaders and Government types in the next update. There is a ton of other things that have changed since march as well. Putin is again (officially) leading russia, france now has Hollande etc. Libya's leader is no longer correct etc etc etc. These will all be updated as well. (After Update 3 is released By BG) I appreciate you bringing them to my attention though as I might have forgotten to switch them. Also there is a thread where you can note that a leader has changed since the last update so i have a ready list available for when I go to make the changes. You can find it here fistalis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=gdmw&action=display&thread=29If you come across any other nations that you question the government type of feel free to post them. Preferably to their own thread. As much as I would like to its hard for me to research everything thoroughly. Sometimes I need a bit of a tip that I should look further into something. Just so happens that the ones you mentioned I was aware of because of fluid situation in that part of the world. (currently I'm looking at all the Attacks on U.S. embassies and dreading how much I have to adjust civilian diplomatic ratings. But thats a discussion for another thread) I think that Iraq should be a democracy because look at the parliament, no one party holds a majority, that looks like free parliamentary elections to me. Sure the Prime Minister holds wide powers but I would say at worst this makes Iraq a Presidential Republic which is, in my opinion, still a democracy ;D I will post other problems I find in another topic |
|
|
|
Post by Fistalis on Sept 18, 2012 20:20:54 GMT -6
The last update was released March 3rd of this year. At the time Egypt was under control of its military. Hence the dictatorship with General Sharaf as the leader. Mohamed Morisi Is already added in my version. Somalia Was under control of the Transitional federal Government and hadn't had elections yet. As for Iraq, Al-maliki was hand selected by the U.S. in 2006 and Is the Prime minister, the minister of the Interior, Minister of defense and minister of national security.(6 years later) Sound like a democracy to you? (I put talibani in as leader though ) Yemen the situation was still very fluid back at the time of the last update. So some of them are likely to see changes in both leaders and Government types in the next update. There is a ton of other things that have changed since march as well. Putin is again (officially) leading russia, france now has Hollande etc. Libya's leader is no longer correct etc etc etc. These will all be updated as well. (After Update 3 is released By BG) I appreciate you bringing them to my attention though as I might have forgotten to switch them. Also there is a thread where you can note that a leader has changed since the last update so i have a ready list available for when I go to make the changes. You can find it here fistalis.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=gdmw&action=display&thread=29If you come across any other nations that you question the government type of feel free to post them. Preferably to their own thread. As much as I would like to its hard for me to research everything thoroughly. Sometimes I need a bit of a tip that I should look further into something. Just so happens that the ones you mentioned I was aware of because of fluid situation in that part of the world. (currently I'm looking at all the Attacks on U.S. embassies and dreading how much I have to adjust civilian diplomatic ratings. But thats a discussion for another thread) I think that Iraq should be a democracy because look at the parliament, no one party holds a majority, that looks like free parliamentary elections to me. Sure the Prime Minister holds wide powers but I would say at worst this makes Iraq a Presidential Republic which is, in my opinion, still a democracy ;D I will post other problems I find in another topic Simply allowing people to vote doesn't make a democracy. There is a warrant for the arrest and death penalty of the Sunni vice president. And al-maliki holds pretty much absolute power. you can read more here. www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2012/iraq |
|
|
|
Post by cdiplayer on Sept 19, 2012 2:29:30 GMT -6
Yes but the lack of any clear majority party in the parliament would imply that free elections were held. Also according to that link the most recent parliamentary elections were "seen as relatively free and fair. The electoral commission took candidates’ complaints seriously and conducted a partial recount, but found no evidence of significant fraud." Also wow I never realized how constipated the system for choosing a Prime Minister is in Iraq. It doesn't seem to me that there is any clear definition of when the Prime Minster's rule should end. Nevertheless I still think it should be ranked as a democracy because in a dictatorship the authority all rests with one person. In Iraq a significant amount of power is also given to the Parliament and the President.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fistalis on Sept 19, 2012 3:52:02 GMT -6
Yes but the lack of any clear majority party in the parliament would imply that free elections were held. Also according to that link the most recent parliamentary elections were "seen as relatively free and fair. The electoral commission took candidates’ complaints seriously and conducted a partial recount, but found no evidence of significant fraud." Also wow I never realized how constipated the system for choosing a Prime Minister is in Iraq. It doesn't seem to me that there is any clear definition of when the Prime Minster's rule should end. Nevertheless I still think it should be ranked as a democracy because in a dictatorship the authority all rests with one person. In Iraq a significant amount of power is also given to the Parliament and the President. As I said, elections alone doesn't make a democracy. He has already broken the agreement he struck with the other parties to maintain the of position prime minister by keeping the various cabinet positions himself rather than appointing members of the parties who agreed to back him to them and continues to issue arrest warrants for Political Opposition figures and election officials. Also he has continued to move more and more powers into his direct control. Including the IHEC(Iraqs electoral commission) and Iraqs central bank. When Jalal Talibani led a movement in parliament and tried to hold a vote of no confidence to unseat Maliki, Maliki simply claimed the signatures were fraudulent. Then ordered an investigation into the the allegations of fraud preventing the vote from happening. Theoretically Iraq is a democracy. However the reality it is far different. |
|
)